Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2025
Multi-perspective analysis of daVinci surgical virtual reality training: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Status of the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in robotic surgical skills training in the modern robotic era and future horizons: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Critical appraisal of "Multi‑perspective analysis of daVinci surgical virtual reality training: a prospective randomized controlled study".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Comment on "Multi-perspective analysis of daVinci surgical virtual reality training".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Innovative strategies for reconstructing medical education through technology: a literature review.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explored the impact of virtual reality (VR) training on improving the acquisition of basic robotic surgical skills by analyzing the effects of training in the daVinci Surgical System (dVSS) simulator from multiple perspectives. 27 subjects were randomly divided into a VR-training group and a control group, with the VR-training group (n = 12) receiving training on the dVSS simulator (XI) to achieve expert-specific proficiency status, and the control group (n = 15) receiving no training. All the subjects subsequently wore electroencephalography (EEG) equipment to perform 6 tasks and repeated 3 times on the dVSS simulator (SI). The Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) scores, dVSS scores, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA TLX) scores, and EEG data of all the subjects were collected to conduct a comprehensive and multi-perspective analysis for dVSS training. Learning curve analysis revealed that all trainees improved their basic robotic surgical skills and reached a steady state after training. Compared with the control group, the VR-training group received higher the GEARS scores (24.91 ± 3.36 vs. 19.68 ± 3.07; p < 0.01) and dVSS scores and lower the NASA TLX scores (40.04 ± 10.55 vs. 48.2 ± 9.88; p < 0.01). In the EEG analysis, the VR-training group had higher scores in the Beta band and the Low-gamma band in the brain regions and had greater energy activation than did the control group. This randomized controlled trial combined subjective and objective evaluations to comprehensively analyze subjects' technical and nontechnical skills. It demonstrated that training on the dVSS simulator significantly improved trainees' basic robotic surgical skills and that they could achieve better basic robotic surgical skills at lower workloads. Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Center. The trial registration number (TRN) was ChiCTR2400088465, and the registration day was August 20, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.