ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Evaluating the learning curve of total ultrasound guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complex renal stones using"30-degree triangulation"technique.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of hydronephrosis grade on surgical parameters and stone-free rates in prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective multivariable study.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Research Progress in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Upper Urinary Tract Stones: A Review.Research and reports in urology · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy without fluoroscopy: early surgical experience with video-based technical insights.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Fracture Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Emergency Applications.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the learning curve of in the training of total ultrasound(US) guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) in complex renal stones using "30-degree principle" technique. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 80 patients were included in this study to evaluate the learning curve of US guided PCNL in an inexperienced novice. They were divided into 8 groups based on timing of the surgery to evaluate the outcomes within the groups. The operator has mastered the"30-degree triangulation" technique for US-guided percutaneous renal puncture by education and theoretical study. Two important parameters were reviewed, namely US screening time and puncture time. Other peri-operative data were also recorded.
resultsThe mean US screening time was 509.3 s for the first 10 cases. It decreased significantly to an average of 226.3 s through 30 to 40. Although the US screening time gradually shortened with accumulated experience and stabilized at an average of 152.5 s through 70-80 cases, there was no significant difference between the following groups. Puncture time declined from 558.8 s in the first group to a mean of 202.3 s in the patients 30 to 40. Consistent with the trend in US screening time, although puncture time continued to decrease, there was no significant difference between them in subsequent patient groups. There were no significant differences in the hemoglobin drop, stone-free rate(SFR), post-hospitalization, or severe complication rate between each groups.
conclusionsThe acceptable outcome of PCNL guided by total ultrasound in complex stones could be achieved after 40 cases under the premise of mastering the "30-degree triangulation"technique. The US screening time and puncture time dropped to a relative steady level after 40 times of practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40377746What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.