Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40377677›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Automated CT segmentation for lower extremity tissues in lymphedema evaluation using deep learning.

Seongwon Na, Se Jin Choi, Yousun Ko, Bushra Urooj, Jimi Huh, Seungwoo Cha, Chul Jung, Hwayeong Cheon, Jae Yong Jeon, Kyung Won Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seongwon Na *Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Se Jin Choi *Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yousun KoBiomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Bushra UroojDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jimi HuhDepartment of Radiology, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Yeongtong-gu, South Korea.
Seungwoo ChaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chul JungDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hwayeong CheonBiomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Yong JeonDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jyjeon71@gmail.com.
Kyung Won KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. medimash@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1532-5970

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HR18C0016National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1A2B5B03001891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesClinical assessment of lymphedema, particularly for lymphedema severity and fluid-fibrotic lesions, remains challenging with traditional methods. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning segmentation tool for automated tissue component analysis in lower extremity CT scans. MATERIALS AND

methodsFor development datasets, lower extremity CT venography scans were collected in 118 patients with gynecologic cancers for algorithm training. Reference standards were created by segmentation of fat, muscle, and fluid-fibrotic tissue components using 3D slicer. A deep learning model based on the Unet++ architecture with an EfficientNet-B7 encoder was developed and trained. Segmentation accuracy of the deep learning model was validated in an internal validation set (n = 10) and an external validation set (n = 10) using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volumetric similarity (VS). A graphical user interface (GUI) tool was developed for the visualization of the segmentation results.

resultsOur deep learning algorithm achieved high segmentation accuracy. Mean DSCs for each component and all components ranged from 0.945 to 0.999 in the internal validation set and 0.946 to 0.999 in the external validation set. Similar performance was observed in the VS, with mean VSs for all components ranging from 0.97 to 0.999. In volumetric analysis, mean volumes of the entire leg and each component did not differ significantly between reference standard and deep learning measurements (p > 0.05). Our GUI displays lymphedema mapping, highlighting segmented fat, muscle, and fluid-fibrotic components in the entire leg.

conclusionOur deep learning algorithm provides an automated segmentation tool enabling accurate segmentation, volume measurement of tissue component, and lymphedema mapping. KEY POINTS: Question Clinical assessment of lymphedema remains challenging, particularly for tissue segmentation and quantitative severity evaluation. Findings A deep learning algorithm achieved DSCs > 0.95 and VS > 0.97 for fat, muscle, and fluid-fibrotic components in internal and external validation datasets. Clinical relevance The developed deep learning tool accurately segments and quantifies lower extremity tissue components on CT scans, enabling automated lymphedema evaluation and mapping with high segmentation accuracy.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLower ExtremityLymphedemaRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedDeep learningImage processing (computer-assisted)Lower extremityLymphedemaX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.