Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40377656›Full record

ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2025

[Knowledge and attitudes toward assisted suicide : Survey of members of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI)].

Yann-Nicolas Batzler, Manuela Schallenburger, Jacqueline Schwartz, Till Brune, Susanne Feit, Theresa Tenge, Remo Küppers, Stefan Meier, Martin Neukirchen

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yann-Nicolas BatzlerZentrum für altersübergreifende Palliativmedizin und Kinderschmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
Manuela SchallenburgerInterdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. manuela.schallenburger@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Jacqueline SchwartzInterdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Till BruneInterdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Susanne FeitInterdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Theresa TengeKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Remo KüppersKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Stefan MeierKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Martin NeukirchenInterdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ban on assisted suicide "intended as a recurring pursuit" was lifted by the German Federal Constitutional Court in 2020. Consequently, the German Medical Council repealed § 16 sentence 3 of the (model) professional code ("They [doctors] may not provide assistance for suicide"). Two legislative proposals to regulate assisted suicide failed in the German Bundestag in 2023. To date, medical staff lack a basis for action when dealing with patients who wish to die. The opinions, attitudes and perspectives of professional groups are important with regard to assisted suicide in order to be able to draw up practical regulations that can be implemented in everyday medical practice.

objectivesThe aim of this survey is to assess the knowledge about the legal situation in Germany as well as perceptions and attitudes towards assisted suicide among members of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study group developed a questionnaire in repeated interdisciplinary and multiprofessional discussions based on a literature review and a previous survey among younger physicians. The questionnaire consisted of questions on the legal and statutory situation of assisted suicide in Germany, personal attitudes and demographic data. It was distributed via the DGAI member newsletter using an online link.

resultsFrom 08/2023-01/2024, out of 25,573 reachable members, 1056 viewed the survey (view rate: 4%), 822 participated, of which 686 completed the questionnaire (completion rate: 83%). Of all participants, 99% (n = 676/686) were physicians; 56% (n = 385/686) were older than 50 years. 45% (n = 310/686) of participants stated that they were aware of the judgment on the invalidity of section 217 of the German criminal code. 86% (n = 589/686) of respondents incorrectly believed that it is prohibited in Germany to offer assisted suicide intended as a recurring pursuit and 21% (n = 142/686) of respondents falsely believed that assisted suicide is a criminal offense in Germany. 77% (n = 527/686) would prefer a new legal regulation on assisted suicide in order to achieve greater legal certainty. 55% (n = 374/686) stated that healthcare workers are the appropriate point of contact to decide on the permissibility of assisted suicide. Of all respondants, 45% (n = 305/686) have asked patients about the existence of death wishes in their professional career; 23% (n = 159/686) of respondents have never done so. 71% (n = 486/686) declined to participate in assisted suicide for patients regardless of the health condition; 65% (n = 443/686) indicated they could only envision participation in a palliative care setting.

conclusionsParticipating members of the DGAI show a lack of knowledge regarding the current legal framework surrounding assisted suicide in Germany. They express the hope that future legal regulations will provide legal certainty in this sensitive area. The findings of this study highlight the complexity inherent in the issue of assisted suicide. Subsequent research and policy development should focus on addressing the needs and challenges faced by clinicians and patients, while fostering the establishment of clear guidelines and regulatory frameworks to ensure the provision of safe and ethically responsible care.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePhysiciansSuicide, AssistedAdultAgedCritical CareFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocieties, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesEuthanasiaLegislaturePalliative careSuicide alternativesSuicide assistance

Identifiers

PMID40377656
PMCPMC12165895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.