ArticleThe oncologist2025
Response to a novel type II RAF inhibitor in diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor with BRAF fusion.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DL-GNT) is a rare disease which is more often diagnosed in children and adolescents than adults. Activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway is implicated in the majority of cases, and BRAF fusions are the most common genetic alteration. BRAF fusions result in dimerization and constitutive downstream MAPK/ERK activity, against which type I RAF inhibitors have limited efficacy. Type II RAF inhibitors stabilize RAF in an inactive conformation and inhibit both dimer protomers, thus inhibiting downstream MAPK/ERK activity in the setting of BRAF fusions. CASE PRESENTATION: A previously-healthy 33 year old man was diagnosed with DL-GNT, which harbored a pathogenic BRAF:KIAA1549 gene fusion. He was initially treated with a MEK inhibitor but developed drug-related cardiotoxicity. Without treatment, he developed significant functional limitations due to leptomeningeal disease. A compassionate use indication was pursued for an investigational CNS-penetrant type II BRAF inhibitor, tovorafenib. Within 3 months of initiating the medication, the patient experienced notable gains in functional status and with over 12 months of treatment has been able to rejoin recreational activities.
conclusionsThis case highlights the importance of tumor molecular characterization, particularly in rare tumors, whereby identification of the BRAF:KIAA1594 gene fusion led to an appropriate selection of a type II BRAF inhibitor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.