Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40377439›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2025

Days spent with healthcare contact by patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer in the last year of life.

Daniel Sentana-Lledo, Amelia Barnett, David J Einstein, Arjun Gupta, Alicia K Morgans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Time toxicity in cancer care: a systematic review of definitions and measurement methods.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel Sentana-LledoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Amelia BarnettBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
David J EinsteinBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Arjun GuptaMasonic Cancer Center at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0875-4731
Alicia K MorgansDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDays spent with healthcare contact during cancer treatment, or "time toxicity," may be particularly relevant to patients with end-stage malignancies, including metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), considering further cancer-directed therapies near the end-of-life. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively assessed healthcare contact days (ie, days with healthcare contact outside the home) in the last 12 months of 96 patients with mCRPC at an academic cancer center. We compared contact days in the 90-day period between 12 and 9 months prior to death ("first quarter") and the 90-day period prior to death ("last quarter") using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, with additional univariate analyses focused on clinicodemographic variables, particularly systemic treatments.

resultsThere were higher median [IQR] total contact days in the last vs first quarter (6 [2,17] vs 4 [3,6], P < .01), driven by emergency room visits and hospitalizations. Compared to patients off treatment in the first quarter (4 [3,4]), chemotherapy (5 [4,6], P = .02) and radiotherapeutics (5 [4,9], P = .03) were associated with greater contact days, but not androgen signaling inhibitors (3 [2,5], P = .20). However, there were no differences in contact days by treatment in the last quarter. Patients enrolled in hospice experienced similar contact days between the last and first quarters (4 [2,15] vs 4 [3,7], P = .22).

conclusionPatients with mCRPC experienced increased healthcare contact in the last three months of life resulting from higher inpatient level of care, despite most enrolling in hospice. Future studies can further set expectations on time toxicity in end-stage mCRPC.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantTerminal CareAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective Studiesend-of-lifehealthcare contacthospicemetastatic prostate cancertime toxicity

Identifiers

PMID40377439
PMCPMC12082824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.