Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40377433›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025

Implicit Solvent Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization.

Danil Kaliakin, Akhil Shajan, Fangchun Liang, Kenneth M Merz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantum-Centric Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  3. Molecular Quantum Computations on a Protein.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danil KaliakinCenter for Computational Life Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9354-8248
Akhil ShajanCenter for Computational Life Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8370-3382
Fangchun LiangCenter for Computational Life Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5859-8231
Kenneth M MerzCenter for Computational Life Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-5893

Funding

Modeling Transition Metal Ion Binding to ProteinsR01GM130641 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KENNETH M. MERZ · 2019 to 2026
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD) method shows great promise in quantum-centric simulations of ground state energies in molecular systems. Inclusion of solute-solvent interactions in simulations of electronic structure is critical for biochemical and medical applications. However, all of the previous applications of the SQD method were shown for gas-phase simulations of the electronic structure. The present work aims to bridge this gap by introducing the integral equation formalism polarizable continuum model (IEF-PCM) of solvent into the SQD calculations. We perform SQD/cc-pVDZ IEF-PCM simulations of methanol, methylamine, ethanol, and water in aqueous solution using quantum hardware and compare our results to CASCI/cc-pVDZ IEF-PCM simulations. Our simulations on ibm_cleveland, ibm_kyiv, and ibm_marrakesh quantum devices are performed with 27, 30, 41, and 52 qubits demonstrating the scalability of SQD IEF-PCM simulations.

Identifiers

PMID40377433
PMCPMC12169659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.