ReviewBritish medical bulletin2025
Current perspectives on the mental health of UK military personnel and veterans.
Review in British medical bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The prevalence and incidence of sleep disorder symptoms, correlates, and sex-stratified longitudinal associations with mental and menstrual health outcomes in UK Service Personnel: a prospective survey-based cohort study protocol.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis narrative review sets out to explore the current literature surrounding the mental health of serving personnel and veterans. SOURCES OF DATA: UK literature published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and publicly available UK Ministry of Defence reports. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Evidence suggests that common mental disorders are more prevalent in the UK serving and veteran personnel than in the general population. Risk factors include being female, adverse childhood events, combat exposure, and physical combat injury. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Post-traumatic stress disorder rates are broadly similar between UK serving personnel and the general population, though certain groups are at increased risk, such as veterans who deployed to Iraq/Afghanistan in combat roles. GROWING POINTS: Understanding ways to maximize positive psychological outcomes, address poor sleep, and support those with combat injuries and chronic pain are key priorities for research/interventions. The prevalence of moral injury and military sexual trauma in the UK Armed Forces is currently unknown. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: A longitudinal study following recruits including those who are part of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning or other sexualities and gender identities (LGBTQ+) community, or who have a neurodivergent condition, from entry to post-service would enhance our understanding of how serving in the Armed Forces impacts the mental health and wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.