ArticleVeterinary ophthalmology2026
Ultrasonographic Appearance of a Posterior Lenticonus in a Cat.
Article in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasonographic Appearance of a Posterior Lenticonus in a Cat.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to present high-quality and up-to-date ocular ultrasonographic images and videos of a posterior lenticonus with concomitant mature cataract in a cat. Additionally, the clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcome are reported for completeness and to confirm the diagnosis. An 8-year-old castrated male domestic shorthair cat presented due to unilateral cataract. Ophthalmological examination revealed a mature cataract without clinically detectable uveitis. Hematological and biochemical analyses were unremarkable, and tests for common infectious diseases associated with feline uveitis were negative. Electroretinography and ocular ultrasound were performed as part of the presurgical planning for phacoemulsification. Retinal function was normal. Ultrasonographic examination revealed a severely distorted shape of the posterior lens capsule (PLC) with hyperechoic material protruding into the vitreous body. Neither a PLC fibrovascular plaque nor a persistent hyaloid artery was identified. These findings were interpreted as a possible rupture of the posterior lens capsule with lens material extruding into the vitreous body. Posterior lenticonus was considered a less likely differential diagnosis. The owner elected to proceed with phacoemulsification surgery. Intraoperatively, the posterior lens capsule was found to be intact. An axial posterior lenticonus with cataractous lens material bulging together with the capsule into vitreous was identified. An intraocular lens was successfully implanted. Given the better surgical prognosis compared to capsule ruptures, posterior lenticonus, although rare, should be considered a differential diagnosis, particularly when a cone-shaped protrusion lacking Doppler signal is identified at the posterior lens capsule extending into the vitreous body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.