ArticleJournal of global health2025
Association of changes in overall and specific leisure activities with long-term all-cause mortality in older adults: a nationwide cohort study.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Leisure activities (LAs) are vital for healthy ageing and are linked to lower mortality risk in older adults. However, most previous longitudinal studies have assessed LAs at only one time point. We aimed to explore the impact of dynamic changes in LAs on subsequent all-cause mortality among older adults. Methods: We enrolled 21 262 older adults who had participated in the six waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) in 1998, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008, and 2011. All participants completed two consecutive assessments of LAs (including seven typical activities) during the first two waves (mean interval = 2.72 years (standard deviation = 0.08)); we further followed them up until 2018, i.e. beyond the 2011 CLHLS. We divided them into five categories according to the change pattern of LAs: stable low (low-low), stable moderate (moderate-moderate), stable high (high-high), LAs increase (low-moderate, low-high, moderate-high), and LAs decrease (high-moderate, high-low, moderate-low). We used a Cox proportional hazard model to test the association between changes in LAs and all-cause mortality, including demographic characteristics, health behaviours, and disease history as covariates. Results: We documented 15 065 death events during 80 045.39 person-years of follow-up. Compared with the stable moderate group, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of mortality for the stable low group and stable high group were 1.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.21-1.35) and 0.66 (95% CI = 0.62-0.71), respectively. An increase in LAs was associated with a lower risk of mortality (aHR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.78-0.88), while a decrease in LAs was associated with a higher risk of mortality (aHR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.01-1.09). The protective effect of LAs increase on premature death was more pronounced in men than in women. The main results remained stable in subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Maintaining and increasing participation in leisure time activities significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older individuals in our sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.