Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40377005›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2025

Reactive Oxygen Species: From Tumorigenesis to Therapeutic Strategies in Cancer.

Iqra Attique, Zahra Haider, Maha Khan, Samina Hassan, Mohamed Mohamed Soliman, Wisam Nabeel Ibrahim, Sumaira Anjum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Anoikis in cancer: molecular mechanisms, resistance, and therapeutic strategies.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Role of alternative splicing in cancer progression.Irish journal of medical science · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Ultrasonic exposure enhances the body's antioxidant capacity.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iqra AttiqueDepartment of Biotechnology, Kinnaird College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Zahra HaiderDepartment of Biotechnology, Kinnaird College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Maha KhanDepartment of Biotechnology, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Samina HassanDepartment of Botany, Kinnaird College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mohamed Mohamed SolimanClinical Laboratory Sciences Department, Turabah University College, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7208-7123
Wisam Nabeel IbrahimDepartment of Biomedical Science, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6008-1947
Sumaira AnjumDepartment of Biotechnology, Kinnaird College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

Qatar National Library
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReactive oxygen species (ROS), a class of highly reactive molecules, are closely linked to the pathogenesis of various cancers. While ROS primarily originate from normal cellular processes, external stimuli can also contribute to their production. Cancer cells typically exhibit elevated ROS levels due to disrupted redox homeostasis, characterized by an imbalance between antioxidant and oxidant species. ROS play a dual role in cancer biology: at moderate levels, they facilitate tumor progression by regulating oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, inducing mutations, promoting proliferation, extracellular matrix remodeling, invasion, immune modulation, and angiogenesis. However, excessive ROS levels can cause cellular damage and initiate apoptosis, necroptosis, or ferroptosis.

methodsThis review explores molecular targets involved in redox homeostasis dysregulation and examines the impact of ROS on the tumor microenvironment (TME). Literature from recent in vitro and in vivo studies was analyzed to assess how ROS modulation contributes to cancer development and therapy.

resultsFindings indicate that ROS influence cancer progression through various pathways and cellular mechanisms. Targeting ROS synthesis or enhancing ROS accumulation in tumor cells has shown promising anticancer effects. These therapeutic strategies exhibit significant potential to impair tumor growth while also interacting with elements of the TME.

conclusionThe ROS serve as both promoters and suppressors of cancer depending on their intracellular concentration. Their complex role offers valuable opportunities for targeted cancer therapies. While challenges remain in precisely modulating ROS for therapeutic benefit, they hold promise as synergistic agents alongside conventional treatments, opening new avenues in cancer management.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinogenesisNeoplasmsReactive Oxygen SpeciesAnimalsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyOxidation-ReductionTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsReactive Oxygen Speciescancerhomeostatic dysregulationreactive oxygen speciessignal transducertumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID40377005
PMCPMC12082284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.