Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376875›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of health planning and management2025

Contributing Factors to Safety: What Hospitalized Patients Can Tell Us? A Cross-Sectional Study.

Franciely Daiana Engel, Caroline Cechinel-Peiter, Diovane Ghignatti da Costa, José Luis Guedes Dos Santos, Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann, Elena Bohomol, Chantal Backman, Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Mello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of health planning and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Franciely Daiana EngelGraduate Program in Nursing, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2376-4164
Caroline Cechinel-PeiterGraduate Program in Nursing, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Diovane Ghignatti da CostaGraduate Program in Nursing, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
José Luis Guedes Dos SantosGraduate Program in Nursing, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Alacoque Lorenzini ErdmannGraduate Program in Nursing, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Elena BohomolGraduate Program in Nursing, Nursing School, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Chantal BackmanSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de MelloGraduate Program in Nursing, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrazil has the second-highest COVID-19 mortality rate worldwide. While there are currently no guidelines for involving patients in their own safety, recognising patients' valuable feedback can be decisive for the safety and quality of healthcare. Thus, this study aimed to describe the patient feedback on factors contributing to safety in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in Brazil and to examine associations with patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in nine Brazilian university hospitals. Data collection using the Patient Measure of Safety (PMOS) questionnaire was conducted by telephone with 447 patients who recovered from COVID-19. Descriptive and multilevel linear regression models were used to verify the sociodemographic characteristics associated with PMOS.

resultsPatients felt safer when they accessed healthcare resources, when health professionals communicated well, and when they had good teamwork skills. Sociodemographic and clinical factors influenced the patient's perception of safety. A lower perception of safety was observed among patients aged 18-39 years old, of mixed race, and who had more than six symptoms during hospitalisation. Higher perceptions of safety were identified among patients with higher education, who lived in the countryside, and who required admission to the ICU.

conclusionsThis study highlighted the potential for patients to become crucial allies in ensuring safety within hospital settings by providing insights into their care, and how sociodemographic characteristics can influence the perception of safety.

Indexed as

COVID-19HospitalizationPatient SafetyAdolescentAdultAgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adulthospitalpatient outcome assessmentpatient participationpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID40376875
PMCPMC12411689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.