ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Mapping the landscape of AI and ML in vaccine innovation: A bibliometric study.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in immune checkpoint inhibitor research: A bibliometric analysis of the landscape.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Decoding AI Competence: Benchmarking Large Language Models (LLMs) in Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment-A Systematic Evaluation of Generative AI Accuracy and Completeness.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for coordinating vaccine design, antiviral discovery, and real-world monitoring in the era of emerging and endemic viral threats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- From empirical vaccinology to predictive systems-based vaccine design: multi-omics integration, artificial intelligence, and global equity challenges.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-, organoid-, and organ-on-chip-powered models to improve pre-clinical animal testing of vaccines and immunotherapeutics: potential, progress, and challenges.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies, their applications in the medical field have expanded significantly. Particularly in vaccine innovation, AI and ML have shown considerable potential. This article employs bibliometric analysis to examine the progress of AI and ML in vaccine innovation over recent years. By conducting literature retrieval, data extraction, and intelligent analysis through Web of Science, it provides more accurate and comprehensive insights into vaccine development and dosimetry. The rapid growth in research publications since 2012, particularly the geometric growth observed since 2017, underscores the increasing recognition of the potential of AI and ML to revolutionize vaccine development. However, despite the substantial benefits of AI and ML in vaccine innovation, challenges remain regarding data quality, algorithm reliability, and ethical considerations. As technology continues to advance and research deepens, AI and machine learning are anticipated to play an even more pivotal role in vaccine innovation. Notably, AI has the potential to accelerate vaccine development timelines, particularly in the context of emerging infectious diseases. By leveraging data-driven insights and predictive modeling, AI can streamline processes such as antigen discovery, clinical trial design, and risk assessment, thereby enabling faster responses to public health emergencies. This capability is especially critical for addressing sudden outbreaks of infectious diseases, where rapid deployment of effective vaccines can significantly mitigate global health risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.