Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376847›Full record

ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2025

Structural covariance analysis for neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory brain disorders.

Neus Mongay-Ochoa, Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla, Vinzenz Fleischer, Deborah Pareto, Àlex Rovira, Jaume Sastre-Garriga, Sergiu Groppa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [MRI in neurodegenerative Parkinsonian syndromes].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neus Mongay-OchoaDepartment of Neurology, Saarland University and Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg 66421, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0338-4797
Gabriel Gonzalez-EscamillaDepartment of Neurology, Saarland University and Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg 66421, Germany.
Vinzenz FleischerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany.
Deborah ParetoSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08035, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7356-3769
Àlex RoviraSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08035, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2132-6750
Jaume Sastre-GarrigaMutiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08035, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1589-2254
Sergiu GroppaDepartment of Neurology, Saarland University and Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg 66421, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural MRI can robustly assess brain tissue alterations related to neurological diseases and ageing. Traditional morphological MRI metrics, such as cortical volume and thickness, only partially relate to functional impairment and disease trajectories at the individual level. Emerging research has increasingly focused on reconstructing interregional meso- and macro-structural relationships in the brain by analysing covarying morphometric patterns. These patterns suggest that structural variations in specific brain regions tend to covary with deviations in other regions across individuals, a phenomenon termed structural covariance. This concept reflects the idea that physiological and pathological processes follow an anatomically defined spreading pattern. Advanced computational strategies, particularly those within the graph-theoretical framework, yield quantifiable properties at both the whole-brain and regional levels, which correlate more closely with the clinical state or cognitive performance than classical atrophy patterns. This review highlights cutting-edge methods for evaluating morphometric covariance networks on an individual basis, with a focus on their utility in characterizing ageing, central nervous system inflammation and neurodegeneration. Specifically, these methods hold significant potential for quantifying structural alterations in patients with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, frontotemporal dementia and multiple sclerosis. By capturing the distinctive morphometric organization of each individual's brain, structural covariance network analyses allow the tracking and prediction of pathology progression and clinical outcomes, information that can be integrated into clinical decision-making and used as variables in clinical trials. Furthermore, by investigating distinct and cross-diagnostic patterns of structural covariance, these approaches offer insights into shared mechanistic processes critical to understanding severe neurological disorders and their therapeutic implications. Such advancements pave the way for more precise diagnostic tools and targeted therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

BrainBrain DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuroinflammatory DiseasesAgingHumansNeuroimaginggrey mattermorphometric covariance networksneurodegenerationneuroinflammationstructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID40376847
PMCPMC12404781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.