Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376759›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC2025

Non-Uniform Sampling for Quantitative NOESY.

William T P Darling, Sven G Hyberts, Mate Erdelyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pulse Programme Considerations for Quantitative NOE Analysis.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William T P DarlingDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0009-3161-8210
Sven G HybertsDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3169-4709
Mate ErdelyiDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0359-5970

Funding

Swedish Research Council 2020-03431Swedish Research Council 2021-00167Swedish Research Council 2022-03431Swedish Research Council 2024-05496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-uniform sampling (NUS) enables faster acquisition of NMR spectra. Concerns about spectral fidelity, particularly in high-dynamic-range experiments like NOESY, have limited its quantitative applications. In this study, we assessed whether optimised Poisson-gap sampling schemes can generate high-fidelity spectra suitable for quantitation and evaluated the effectiveness of NUS ranking tools, NUSscore and nus-tool, in identifying optimal sampling schemes. A total of 25,000 Poisson-gap sampling schemes were generated and ranked using NUSscore, with a subset of 11 of these spanning the score distribution, alongside 15 random-shuffle and the highest and lowest scoring Poisson-gap schemes determined using the signal apex-to-artefact ratio were used for comparison, all with 50% sampling coverage. Additionally, hybrid sampling schemes incorporating a long initial uniformly sampled section, termed US-NUS hybrid schemes, were evaluated. Spectral fidelity was evaluated on interproton distance accuracy, including the proportion of retained interproton distances and their deviation from uniformly sampled reference spectra. NUSscore showed a strong correlation with spectral fidelity. The peak-to-sidelobe ratio implemented in nus-tool showed no correlation, with the relative sensitivity metric showing a weak correlation. Signal-to-artefact apex ratio was also not predictive for identifying sampling schedules with maintained interproton distances. All Poisson-gap sampling schemes however outperformed random-shuffle. The US-NUS hybrids demonstrated improved interproton distance conservation than traditional Poisson-gap sampling schemes with a low seed dependence, making them a promising sampling schedule for quantitative NOESY analysis.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAlgorithmsPoisson DistributionNOESYnon‐uniform samplingNUSquantitative NOE

Identifiers

PMID40376759
PMCPMC12129645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.