ArticlePathology international2025
Proposal for a New Classification of Rare Cancers Adopting Updated Histological Tumor Types.
Article in Pathology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subsite- and histology-specific epidemiology of head and neck cancers in Japan from 2016 to 2019: an application of a new classification of rare cancers.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Head and neck cancer of unknown primary: a nationwide analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan, 2018-2022.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Benign and Malignant Parotid Gland Tumors: Insights from a Five-Year Northeast Romanian Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Real-World Comparison of Gene-Matched vs. Non-Gene-Matched Therapy Outcomes Using Integrated Genomic and Clinical Data.Cancer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several classifications have been proposed to define rare cancers; however, the pathophysiological understanding of tumors evolves rapidly. We propose a New Classification of Rare Cancer (NCRC) using the updated International Classification of Diseases for Oncology 3.2 coding system and World Health Organization Classification of Tumors 5th edition. We applied patient data recorded in the National Cancer Registry of Japan to the new classification, setting a cut-off of a crude incidence rate of 6 cases/100 000/year to define rare cancers, and developed a list of rare cancers in Japan from 2016 to 2019. The NCRC system identified various rare cancers, comprising 20.0% of all cancer diagnoses in this period. To examine this classification system's performance, we compared rare/non-rare labeling of cancers by the Surveillance of Rare Cancers in Europe (RARECARENet) project and NCRC system. Compared with cases using the RARECARENet classification in Europe, 69 351 cases/year (6.8%) switched status with our classification, with 45 293 and 232 109 cases (4 years) switching from rare and non-rare, respectively. Major differences included diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, some thyroid cancers, oral cavity and lip cancers, and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. As the NCRC includes newly classified tumor entities, it warrants validation using other diverse cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.