ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Effects of craniectomy defect on tumor-treating fields.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tantalum-Based Nanomaterials: From Properties to Biomedical Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are alternating electric fields approved for the treatment of glioblastoma. They must penetrate through the skull to reach the gross tumor volume (GTV) in the brain. Since the skull is an attenuator of electric fields, removal of a section of cortical bone by craniectomy may facilitate the delivery of TTFields into the GTV. Methods: We identified a glioblastoma patient who underwent craniectomy for evacuation of a subdural empyema. The patient subsequently received standard adjuvant treatment with TTFields plus temozolomide without replacement of the skull defect. Post-acquisition magnetic resonance imaging datasets were obtained from this index patient and 2 others for virtual craniectomy analysis. After anatomic delineation, a 3-dimensional finite element mesh was generated and then solved for the distribution of applied electric fields, rate of energy deposition, and current density at the GTV. Results: The geometry of craniectomy defect alone, with or without burr holes, did not alter TTFields delivery to GTV. Biomaterials filling the defect could significantly influence electric field penetration, particularly when they are highly conductive at 10 S/m or 7.76 × 10 Conclusions: Craniectomy, biomaterials filling the defect, and the ratio of GTV relative to defect size may interact in a combinatorial fashion in modulating TTFields penetration into the brain. These findings are clinically relevant for personalized TTFields treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.