Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376650›Full record

ArticleIndustrial psychiatry journal

Classifying opioid use disorder based on diagnostic criteria items using cluster analysis.

Shweta Birla, Vinit Patel, Dinesh Gupta, Rishi Gupta, Yatan Pal Singh Balhara, Siddharth Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial psychiatry journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shweta BirlaTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India.
Vinit PatelNational Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Dinesh GuptaTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India.
Rishi GuptaCognis Mindcare, Delhi, India.
Yatan Pal Singh BalharaNational Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Siddharth SarkarNational Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a global concern with a reported shift in changing demographic and biopsychosocial profiles. Characterization of clusters based on diagnostic symptom criteria can help to understand the underlying associations between these criteria. Aim: The present study identifies clusters based on OUD diagnostic criteria, which may reveal clinically relevant subgroups of individuals with OUDs. Materials and Methods: The DSM5 diagnostic system OUD diagnosis was made for 204 male participants. An unsupervised clustering analysis focused on the individual 11 DSM5 diagnostic criteria. Results: Using the DSM5 diagnostic criteria, we obtained two clusters based on severity. Further, analyzing clinical information along with DSM5 criteria, two groups varying in OUD severity, presence of injecting drug use, and employment were identified. Conclusion: Based on cluster analysis, two main clusters of DSM5 criteria emerged. Rather than DSM5 symptoms clustering with each other based on the similarity of symptomatology, they aggregate numerically reflecting severity.

Indexed as

Clinical relevancecluster analysisDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disordersopioid-related disordersphenotype

Identifiers

PMID40376650
PMCPMC12077617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.