ArticleIndustrial psychiatry journal
Understanding the metacognition and impulsivity issues with clinical and cognitive insight in borderline personality disorder - A cross sectional study.
Article in Industrial psychiatry journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Borderline personality disorder (BLPD) is one of the most common personalities disorders frequently encountered in the outpatient setup. Aim: Understanding the role of impulsivity and metacognition in clinical and cognitive insight among BLPD patients. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among 81 patients diagnosed with BLPD. Sociodemographic details were collected, and the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ), Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS), Metacognitive Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Urgency premeditation perseverance sensation seeking - impulsive behavior scale - short version (UPPS-S), and Scale to assess unawareness of mental disorder (SUMD) were applied to assess severity symptomatology, cognitive insight, metacognition, impulsivity and clinical insight, respectively. Results: The mean age ± SD of subject was 22.19 ± 3.79, with a female preponderance (N = 61, 75.3%). The mean ± SD of BCIS, MCQ-30, UPPS-S, SUMD, and BPQ was 7.78 ± 4.11, 66.96 ± 14.95, 50.98 ± 11.72, 5.53 ± 2.36, and 57.56 ± 9.00, respectively. The cognitive (BCIS) and clinical insight (SUMD) were significantly correlated (r = -0.26, P = 0.01). The impulsivity (UPPS) was also positively correlated with BPQ, (r = 0.26, Conclusion: The results of this study can be used in clinical practice by strengthening existing therapies aiming at these areas and thereby enhancing therapeutic alliance, adherence, and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.