Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376576›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Advances in bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Ran Zhang, Chang-Xing Ke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cytotoxicity ofEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ran ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Chang-Xing KeDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer is one of the most common genitourinary malignancies. Radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have become the accepted gold standard for the treatment of resectable muscular invasive bladder cancer due to its ability to surgically remove tumor tissue as thoroughly as possible and reduce the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis, thus improving patient survival. However, RC surgery is challenging and associated with many postoperative complications, requiring patients to have good physical condition to tolerate the procedure. Over the years, with the deepening of medical research and the accumulation of clinical practice, the disease spectrum of bladder cancer has changed significantly. At the same time, the treatment modalities for bladder cancer have also been continuously improved and updated, and bladder-preserving treatment programs have gradually emerged and demonstrated reliable efficacy. Bladder-sparing treatment aims to preserve the physiological function of the bladder while controlling tumor growth, thereby improving patients' quality of life. This approach has led an increasing number of MIBC patients to choose bladder-sparing treatment after considering their individual conditions. In this paper, we review the current methods of bladder-sparing treatment for MIBC patients and related studies to provide a reference for future research.

Indexed as

bladder-preserving therapycomprehensive bladder-preserving therapymultimodality treatmentmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)trimodality treatment

Identifiers

PMID40376576
PMCPMC12078131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.