ArticleJRSM cardiovascular disease
Comparison of prognostic value of triglyceride-glucose index and atherogenic index of plasma in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective study.
Article in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin on Lipid Profiles and Atherogenic Risk Indices in Patients with Heart Failure and a History of CABG: First Evidence in the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Interplay of Cardiometabolic Syndrome Phenotypes and Cardiovascular Risk Indices in Patients Diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Few studies have compared the prognostic value of the triglyceride glucose (TyG) index and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to compare the prognostic value of the TyG index, AIP, and combined diagnosis in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Methods: Patients with ACS who underwent PCI were enrolled and divided into two groups according to major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed to determine independent risk factors for MACCEs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the TyG index, AIP, and combined prediction. Results: The study included 114 patients. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that the TyG index and AIP were independent predictors of MACCEs. The AUC of the TyG index and AIP were 0.710 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.618-0.791) and 0.626 (95% CI: 0.531-0.715), respectively, and the optimal cutoff points were 8.83 and 0.30, respectively. The difference between the TyG index and AIP was not significant. The AUC of the combined diagnosis was 0.706 (95% CI: 0.614-0.788), with no significant improvement compared with the TyG index or AIP. Conclusion: Both the TyG index and AIP were independent predictors of MACCEs in ACS patients undergoing PCI. The TyG index and AIP had similar predictive values for MACCEs, but the combined prediction did not improve significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.