ArticleTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2025
Opportunities and challenges of lifestyle intervention-based digital therapeutics in LDL-C management: a scoping review.
Article in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Wearable Devices and 5G-Powered Remote Precision Rehabilitation on Vascular Function in Post-PCI Patients: An Analysis of the Associations Between FMS, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Arterial Stiffness.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Trial
- Artificial intelligence-driven rational design and optimization of a potent terpenoid-derived PCSK9 inhibitor.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Nutrigenomics meets multi-omics: integrating genetic, metabolic, and microbiome data for personalized nutrition strategies.Genes & nutrition · 2025Review
- Effects of 12 nutritional interventions on type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized trials.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Article
- Beyond black-box AI: Interpretable hybrid systems for dementia care.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent decades, the prevalence of dyslipidemia, especially high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), has risen sharply in China. Although lifestyle interventions are important, traditional face-to-face approaches have limitations. Digital Therapeutics (DTx) can provide an effective solution by delivering remote medical interventions to patients via software and hardware, thereby optimizing existing clinical treatment methods with enhanced convenience and accessibility. Objectives: This study aims to explore the current evidence on the effect of lifestyle intervention-based Digital Therapeutics (LI-DTx) on high LDL-C, and to analyze their advantages and disadvantages. Eligibility criteria: This scoping review examines clinical studies assessing the effects of DTx on LDL-C levels. Papers were included in the final analysis if there was evidence that DTx had effects on lowering LDL-C levels. Sources of evidence: Papers that were published between January 2014 and December 2023 were included in the PubMed database. Charting methods: Data extracted from the publications included country, year, study type, study population, sample size, study duration, intervention, and changes in LDL-C level. Results: A total of 23 target literature were identified. Twenty-one studies confirmed that LI-DTx could optimize the LDL-C level through remote lifestyle interventions such as diet, exercise, medication, and health education, of which 14 studies reported a significant reduction in LDL-C level ( Conclusion: LI-DTx may offer a more effective and sustainable solution for LDL-C management, although several challenges remain. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to provide scientific support for its efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.