ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Three-dimensional measurement and analysis of the compressor urethrae and urethra in postpartum women.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic URP: Revisiting Urethral Retro-Resistance Pressure for Contemporary Sphincter-Targeted Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Characterizing the structural properties and porosity of mid-urethral slings with varied manufacturing techniques.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The position and lines of the compressor urethrae, as well as the different segments and morphological characteristics of the compressor urethrae and urethra have not been systematically characterized. This study thus aimed to quantify the lines, thickness, volume, surface area, and position of the compressor urethrae, as well as the thickness, volume, and surface area in the upper, middle, and lower urethra, in postpartum females via three-dimensional (3D) measurement and analysis methods. Methods: This retrospective study included a total of 90 postpartum women. The 3D models of compressor urethrae and urethra were constructed based on the imaging pictures of these women. The indicators that were analyzed in a 3D plane included volume, surface area, thickness, and diameter lines of the compressor urethrae; the ratio of the compressor urethrae length (CUL) to the urethral length (UL); the distance between the compressor urethrae and the pubic symphysis; the volume, surface area, and thickness of urethra and its different segments; the UL; and the urethral inclination angle (UIA). These indicators were compared between a postpartum-stress urinary incontinence (SUI) group and a control group. Differences in indicators between the segments of urethra were compared. The relationship between related indicators of the compressor urethrae and of the urethra with age was determined. Results: The length, width, and volume of the compressor urethrae in the control group were 23.24±3.29 mm, 24.61±3.79 mm, and 1.47±0.49 cm Conclusions: This study provides reference criteria for the volume, thickness, and surface area of different portions of the compressor urethrae and urethra. The upper and middle urethra may be particularly significant to female urinary continence. Meanwhile, strengthening of the compressor urethrae might help treat female urinary continence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.