Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376488›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Everything everywhere all at once: mapping lay beliefs about self-control.

Jinyao Li, Marleen Gillebaart, Tim van Timmeren, Denise de Ridder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinyao LiDepartment of Social, Health, and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marleen GillebaartDepartment of Social, Health, and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Tim van TimmerenDepartment of Social, Health, and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Denise de RidderDepartment of Social, Health, and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Self-control is essential for achieving long-term goals and is influenced by individuals' beliefs about it. Previous studies have found that those who view self-control as non-limited perform better in cognitive tasks, resist temptations more effectively, and achieve better outcomes. Understanding these beliefs is therefore crucial for fostering stronger self-control, yet a systematic understanding remains lacking. Methods: To comprehensively map these beliefs, participants from the United States, the Netherlands, and China (total Results: By analyzing these responses, we identified 14 key components of self-control beliefs. These beliefs highlight the challenging, committed, and disciplined nature of self-control, offering a broader perspective beyond the traditional view of self-control as a limited resource. Discussion: Findings provide a comprehensive framework for understanding lay beliefs about self-control and underscore their significance in shaping self-control exertion.

Indexed as

lay beliefsopen questionsself-controltrait self-controlwillpower

Identifiers

PMID40376488
PMCPMC12078305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.