SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
Examination of the variables related to parents' irrational beliefs: a meta-analysis study.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the variables that have been studied in relation to parents' irrational beliefs, and to examine the relationships between these variables through meta-analysis. Additionally, this study aimed to explore cultural differences in parents' irrational beliefs by conducting subgroup analyses based on the country in which the study was conducted. Methods: Fifteen studies, which had been issued in the databases of Google Scholar and Web of Science (WOS) between the years of 1990 and 2023, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analyses. In these fifteen studies, the associations of parents' irrational beliefs with twenty three different variables were examined. These variables were reorganized under the titles of "Irrational thoughts", "Positive mental health (Parent)", "Negative mental health (Parent)", "Negative mental health (Child)", "Positive behavior (Parent)", "Negative behavior (Parent)", "Adaptation (Parent)", "Parent-child relationship", "Positive characteristics (Child)" and "Irrational beliefs (Child)" in line with expert opinions. Among these variables, the effect sizes of those that included a sufficient number of studies for meta-analysis were calculated separately. Findings and conclusion: Accordingly, the largest effect size was calculated between parental irrational beliefs and general irrational beliefs (0.60), and the smallest effect size was calculated between parental irrational beliefs and children's negative mental health characteristics (0.15). In the subgroup analyses conducted according to the country of the study, the largest effect sizes were observed in USA for all variables, while the lowest effect sizes were observed in Turkey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.