SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
Antagonistic muscular co-contraction for skilled, healthy piano technique: a scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sport Expertise and Twitch-Derived Agonist-Antagonist Contractile Ratio in Karate Athletes.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This scoping review aimed to generate a novel evidence-based model of antagonistic muscular co-contraction (AMCC)'s effects on human movement. The review applies this model to the context of skilled, healthy piano playing to enable advances in pedagogy and research that can aid pianists in developing and maintaining skill and task-related health. Background: Piano playing is a challenging, complex activity that carries significant risk of playing-related neuromusculoskeletal disorder (PRNDs). AMCC is a contentious, terminologically problematic topic in pedagogical and scientific literature, and has scarcely been studied in relation to piano technique. Methods: Adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the review adopted the search terms "co-contraction," "piano," "co-activation," and "antagonist," consulting 36 aggregated resources and 100 individual journals. After screening, 188 studies published between 1982 and 2021 were included. From these studies, AMCC-related content was extracted, analyzed in relation to piano technique, and categorized. The resultant categories were synthesized into a model representing the characteristics and effects of AMCC in movement. Results: AMCC is a prevalent, complex, and learnable phenomenon, exhibiting the capacity for both positive and negative effects on performance and health. These effects are highly relevant to the task-specific challenges of skilled, healthy piano playing. AMCC can affect sensorimotor task control, accuracy, efficiency, coordination, internal model generation, proprioception, range of motion, individuation, neuromuscular signal-to-noise ratio, speed, power, stability, task-related injury, pain, and rehabilitation. Conclusion: The review and corresponding model suggest that AMCC is a fundamental characteristic of human movement with broad and unique effects on sensorimotor task performance, including piano playing. Of the 188 publications reviewed, none were found to have robust methods investigating AMCC in healthy, skilled pianists; this review underpins ongoing research targeting the nature of AMCC in piano technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.