ReviewCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2025
Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering: From Tissue Regeneration to Biorobotics.
Review in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanobiological landscape of muscle stem cells.Skeletal muscle · 2026Review
- Hybrid SES-MEW Scaffold Strategies: A Narrative Review of Multi-Scale Fiber Architectures for Soft and Hard Tissue Engineering.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advanced materials and devices strategies of mechanical stimulation for tissue regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Assessment of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in enhancing alveolar bone repair and minimizing relapse in a rabbit model.Open veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Prolonged Cell Encapsulation and Gravity-independent Filamented Light Biofabrication of Muscle Constructs.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Shaping 3D minimal model tissues with mechanical constraints to orchestrate muscle differentiation.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Electrospinning for Mimicking Bioelectric Microenvironment in Tissue Regeneration.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With its remarkable adaptability, energy efficiency, and mechanical compliance, skeletal muscle is a powerful source of inspiration for innovations in engineering and robotics. Originally driven by the clinical need to address large irreparable muscle defects, skeletal muscle tissue engineering (SMTE) has evolved into a versatile strategy reaching beyond medical applications into the field of biorobotics. This review highlights recent advancements in SMTE, including innovations in scaffold design, cell sourcing, usage of external physicochemical cues, and bioreactor technologies. Furthermore, this article explores the emerging synergies between SMTE and robotics, focusing on the use of robotic systems to enhance bioreactor performance and the development of biohybrid devices integrating engineered muscle tissue. These interdisciplinary approaches aim to improve functional recovery outcomes while inspiring novel biohybrid technologies at the intersection of engineering and regenerative medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.