Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376481›Full record

ArticleCurrent urology2025

Histopathologic features and parameters predicting recurrence potential of small renal masses.

Senad Bajramović, Berina Hasanović, Jasmin Alić, Nirvana Šabanović Bajramović, Damir Aganović

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Senad BajramovićClinic of Urology, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Berina HasanovićDepartment of Urology, General Hospital "Prim.dr. Abdulah Nakaš," Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Jasmin AlićClinic of Urology, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Nirvana Šabanović BajramovićClinic for Heart, Blood Vessel and Rheumatic Diseases, University Clinical Center Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Damir AganovićClinic of Urology, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced masses with a diameter of ≤4 cm, usually consistent with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study aimed to explore the histopathological features of a contemporary series of SRMs and investigate parameters that could predict their pathological nature, metastatic potential, and recurrence potential. Materials and methods: Small renal masses were identified in 166 of 427 patients who underwent surgery for suspected RCC. The radical nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy ratio was 1:44, and autotransplantation was performed in a single case. Variables associated with metastatic recurrence of SRM were analyzed using χ Results: Renal cell carcinoma was confirmed in 86% (n = 143) of cases, whereas benign tumors were present in 14% (n = 23) of cases. Seventeen percent of the RCC cases were high-grade (Fuhrman G3-4). Among SRMs with a diameter of >2 cm, 71% were malignant. The mean ± standard deviation diameter of the removed SRMs was 28 ± 12 mm, significantly higher in the malignant SRMs group (31 ± 8 vs. 24 ± 9 mm) ( Conclusions: The majority of treated neoplasms were malignant, but their incidence was low among SRMs with a diameter of <2 cm. Our results emphasized the importance of histopathological features and treatment modalities in predicting malignant recurrence.

Indexed as

MetastasisNephrectomyRecurrenceRenal cell carcinomaSmall renal mass

Identifiers

PMID40376481
PMCPMC12076373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.