ReviewCurrent urology2025
Robotic surgical techniques and methods for treating renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus.
Review in Current urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytoreductive Nephrectomy and Thrombectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumor Thrombus: Experience from a High-Volume Center.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Segmental versus non-segmental inferior vena cava resection during robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy: an overlap-weighted analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Robot‑assisted versus open radical nephrectomy and venous tumor thrombectomy: perioperative and oncologic outcomes-an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy from the intercontinental collaboration on renal cell carcinoma.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus (RCC-IVCTT) has a high mortality rate, and surgery is the only promising treatment. Open surgery has been the gold standard treatment for several decades. However, with the development of minimally invasive surgical technologies, the advantages of robotic surgery have gradually emerged. The classic Mayo Clinic Classification system has certain limitations in guiding robotic surgery. Therefore, a new classification system that is compatible with robotic surgery is urgently needed. Advancements in robotic surgery must be systematically summarized and evaluated. Since Abaza's initial report on robotic surgery, the exploration of robotic radical nephrectomy (RRN) with IVC thrombectomy has resulted in numerous related techniques and approaches, including surgical positions and approaches, control of blood vessels, assisted exposure, step-by-step strategy, and preoperative and intraoperative auxiliary technology and equipment. Our team proposed a new tumor thrombus classification system termed the "301 Classification" based on RRN with venous thrombectomy, which matches each level of tumor thrombus with a distinct robotic surgical strategy. With advances in technology and accumulated experience, RRN with IVC thrombectomy holds promise as the preferred surgical option for RCC-IVCTT. Although "301 Classification" can provide objective advantages in robotic surgery, more cases are needed to be optimized for guiding surgery accurately. The overview provided in this paper aims to serve as a reference and inspiration for future research and clinical practice regarding RCC-IVCTT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.