ReviewBiophysical reviews2025
Impact of ecological UV radiation on the photochemistry of nuclear DNA.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidative stress and inflammation in neurodegenerative disorders.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- Synthesis of Ag/TiOScientific reports · 2026Article
- Ultraviolet Light-Induced Skin Cancer and the Safety of Sunscreen Use in Pets-An Important but Under Researched Aspect of Companion Animal Health.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- The Hidden Routes of DNA Photostability: Charge and Proton Transfer in Excited Cytosine-Guanine Tetramers.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory and Anticancer Peptides from Extreme Marine Environments.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ultraviolet radiation as a double-edged regulator of melanocyte function in vitiligo therapy and melanoma carcinogenesis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Djulis (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Generation of cellular reactive oxygen and nitrogen species by exposure to ultraviolet radiation.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Biophysical reviews (ISSUE 2 2025): LAFeBS, alive, kicking, and growing: the story continues...Biophysical reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solar radiation is predominantly Earth's natural ultraviolet (UV) radiation source. The biological effects of UV radiation have been the subject of scientific interest for decades. The most frequent and abundant types of DNA damage comprise the formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone (6-4PP) photoproducts. Upon UVA excitation, the 6-4PPs may undergo an intramolecular 4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.