ReviewBiophysical reviews2025
Selectivity of membrane-active peptides: the role of electrostatics and other membrane biophysical properties.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A MarineMarine drugs · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Sequence-Derived and Molecular Descriptors for Interpretable Modeling of Molecular Systems: Insights from Peptide Hemolysis.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial peptide resistance in Salmonella AMR: the role of surface binding and lipopolysaccharide remodelling: one health implications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Article
- Screening and Validation of Functional Residues of the Antimicrobial PeptideBiomolecules · 2025Article
- Targeted Modification of the Antimicrobial Peptide DGL13K Reveals a Naturally Optimized Sequence for Topical Applications.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Biophysical reviews (ISSUE 2 2025): LAFeBS, alive, kicking, and growing: the story continues...Biophysical reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membrane-active peptides (MAPs) are versatile molecules that interact with lipid bilayers, facilitating processes such as antimicrobial defense, anticancer activity, and membrane translocation. Given that most MAPs are cationic, their selectivity for specific cell membranes has traditionally been attributed to variations in membrane surface charge. However, growing evidence suggests that electrostatics alone cannot fully explain MAPs selectivity. Instead, MAPs activity is also strongly influenced by other membrane biophysical properties, such as lipid packing, phase state, curvature, and the spatial distribution of hydrophobic and charged residues within the peptide sequence. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the biophysical determinants of MAPs selectivity. We begin by examining membrane and cell surface electrostatics and their influence on MAPs-membrane interactions, including electrostatically driven peptide conformational changes and lipid recruitment. We then broaden the discussion to include non-electrostatic factors, such as membrane curvature and rheology, which are primarily influenced by sterol or hopanoid content, as well as acyl chain unsaturation and branching. Together, these processes highlight that MAPs selectivity is not governed by any single membrane property but instead emerges from a synergistic interplay of electrostatic, hydrophobic, and topological factors. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12551-025-01309-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.