ReviewBiophysical reviews2025
Effects of ionizing radiations of different qualities and delivery types on blood cells.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biophysical reviews (ISSUE 2 2025): LAFeBS, alive, kicking, and growing: the story continues...Biophysical reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review explores the effects of ionizing radiation on blood and its components, focusing on its applications, biological impacts, and implications for medical and occupational settings. Ionizing radiation is a cornerstone of modern medicine, playing a critical role in diagnostic imaging, cancer treatment, and preventive measures, such as the irradiation of blood units to prevent transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease. However, it also induces significant alterations in blood cells, including genetic damage, immune suppression, and changes in hematological, biochemical, and hemorheological parameters, depending on the dose, dose rate, and type of radiation. Conventional radiotherapy, hadron therapy, and the emerging FLASH modality exhibit distinct effects on blood. Hadron therapy and FLASH radiotherapy could reduce oxidative stress preserving red blood cell deformability more effectively than conventional methods, thereby minimizing systemic toxicity. However, the underlying mechanisms remain a topic of ongoing investigation. Additionally, studies reveal how different types of radiation, including gamma rays, X-rays, electron beams, and hadrons, uniquely influence blood cells, underscoring the complexity of radiobiological interactions. Challenges and controversies, such as the long-term hematological impact of radiation exposure, individual variability in response, and the potential of radioprotective strategies and immune system stimulation are also addressed. Insights into hemorheological changes and the development of personalized approaches are critical for optimizing therapeutic outcomes and safety protocols. By synthesizing current knowledge, this review emphasizes the need for further research on the effects of ionizing radiation on blood to bridge gaps in understanding and enhance clinical and practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.