Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376415›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2025

New therapeutic strategies for malaria.

Alessandro Sá Pinheiro, Patricia Rieken Macedo Rocco, Celso Caruso-Neves, Ana Acacia Sá Pinheiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandro Sá PinheiroDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH USA.ORCID 0009-0003-2384-8733
Patricia Rieken Macedo RoccoCarlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1412-7136
Celso Caruso-NevesCarlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2415-7753
Ana Acacia Sá PinheiroCarlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3894-1645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria is a life-threatening parasitic disease and remains a significant global health problem, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Malaria cases are widely spread, but the highest incidence occurs in tropical and subtropical areas, especially in developing countries. Despite all efforts to control the disease, the number of cases increased by 5 million from 2021 to 2022. The mechanisms of malaria pathogenesis are still not fully understood. This, combined with the parasite's recurrent ability to develop resistance to standard treatments, hinders effective disease management and control. Therefore, a deep understanding of parasite biology, along with the various aspects of host-parasite interactions, is essential for malaria elimination. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-enclosed vesicles which are secreted by a variety of cells. These tiny structures have emerged as a key component in the mechanisms of pathogenesis of different parasitic diseases, promoting cell-to-cell communication, even in distance. In this review, we explore the latest advancements in EV research in the malaria field, focusing on their role in pathophysiology, as well as their potential as diagnostic tools, alternative therapeutic strategies, and vaccine development. We conclude by highlighting key elements in EV research that could provide insights into the translational application of EVs.

Indexed as

Cell–cell communicationDisease pathogenesisExtracellular vesiclesHost-parasite interactionMalariaPlasmodium

Identifiers

PMID40376415
PMCPMC12075036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.