ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Robot-Assisted Individualized Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients With Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arthroscopic Management of Patellar Instability in Skeletally Immature Patients: Current Concepts and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Two-dimensional robot-assisted physeal-sparing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction can achieve favourable clinical outcomes for skeletally immature patients with recurrent patellar dislocation.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- The clinical outcomes of total vs. half patellar tendon transposition combined with robot-assisted medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and extensive lateral release for the treatment of habitual patellar dislocation in adolescents.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The surgical treatment of patellar instability in children and adolescents can be challenging, as successful surgical techniques used in adults may pose a risk to the open growth plate when applied in this younger population. Purpose: To review a series of adolescent patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent robot-assisted individualized medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence: 4. Methods: This retrospective clinical study included 76 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent MPFL reconstruction by a robot-assisted technique or adductor magnus sling technique from June 2018 to August 2022. All patients were divided into the robot-assisted group (42 patients) or the adductor magnus sling group (34 patients). In both groups, a semitendinosus autograft was used for the MPFL reconstruction. In the robot-assisted group, the graft was fixed to the femur using an interference screw. In the adductor magnus sling group, the graft was loped around the adductor magnus. During the surgery, the distance between Schoettle point and the medial distal femoral physis, along with the simulated angle range of the bone tunnel and the optimal angle, was recorded in the robot-assisted group using an intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation system. The clinical results were evaluated using preoperative and postoperative functional scores and imaging. Results: All patients returned for follow-up at a mean of 39.7 ± 9.8 months after surgery. The mean age of the patients was 13.3 years (range, 10-16 years). The Schoettle points were all located below the medial distal femoral physis, with a mean distance of 6.48 ± 1.78 mm from Schoettle points to the medial distal femoral physis. The angle range of the bone tunnel was achieved by targeting a mean of 8.6° to 23.4° anteriorly and 10.9° to 17.8° distally, with the optimal angles being 14.6° anteriorly and 13.5° distally. No patients experienced recurrent patellar instability after surgery; however, the functional scores in the robot-assisted group were slightly higher than those in the traditional adductor magnus sling group (International Knee Documentation Committee score: 93.2 ± 6.2 vs 86.1 ± 7.9; Lysholm score: 90.0 ± 8.1 vs 85.9 ± 7.3; Kujala score: 87.8 ± 6.8 vs 83.0 ± 8.8; all Conclusion: The intraoperative robotic navigation system confirmed that the Schoettle point can be safely positioned in patients with open epiphyses. The robot-assisted design of individualized anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL using a forward distal oblique bone tunnel is safe and effective, demonstrating good clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.