ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Malrotation Strongly Influences Posterior Tibial Slope Measurement on Lateral Radiographs of the Knee.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proximal anatomical axes show bidirectional variability: Accurate tibial slope requires mechanical axis measurement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Management of increased posterior tibial slope in ACL deficiency: A narrative review and recommendation of the Osteotomy Committee of the German Knee Society.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Review
- Automatic extraction of 2D patellofemoral bone morphology and alignment measures from 3D models in a young adolescent population.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2026Article
- A simple planning tool for tibial slope osteotomy-Osteotomy depth is a precise parameter to determine wedge height.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Effects of axial malrotation on posterior tibial slope measurement: a digitally reconstructed radiograph study enabling automated quality assessment.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Posterior tibial slope (PTS) is commonly measured on lateral radiographs, but there is an ongoing discussion on which criteria are essential as quality standards. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of malrotation of the tibia on lateral radiographs for PTS measurement. It was hypothesized that malrotation alters the measured PTS. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: An infratuberositary osteotomy was performed on a tibial saw bone model, and 3 conditions-2 with increased PTS-were tested with the same experimental setup (series 1, closed osteotomy; series 2, 5-mm anterior opening; series 3, 10-mm anterior opening). Long lateral radiographs were taken from +12.5° of external tibial rotation (ETR) to -20° of internal tibial rotation (ITR), in steps of 2.5°. PTS was measured with the mechanical axis (MA) and the proximal anatomic axis (PAA). In addition, the distance between the medial and lateral posterior tibial condyles was measured (in mm). Results: In test series 1, between +12.5° to 0° of ETR and 0° to-20° of ITR, a change in PTS of 2.8°± 1.0 (ETR) and 3.7°±1.3 (ITR) for the MA and 3.7°± 1.4 (ETR) and 4.1°±1.5 (ITR) for the PAA was detected. In test series 2, changes of 1.5°± 0.5 (ETR) and 3.7±1.3 (ITR) for the MA and 1.6°± 0.6 (ETR) and 4.3°±1.4 (ITR) for the PAA were observed; likewise, in test series 3, changes of 1.8°± 0.7 (ETR) and 3.7°±1.3 (ITR) for the MA and 2.2°± 0.9 (ETR) and 4.2°±1.3 (ITR) for the PAA were observed. ETR of +12.5° resulted in a distance of 5 mm, and ITR of -20° resulted in a distance of 10 mm between the posterior tibial condyles in all testing conditions. There was no significant difference among the 3 testing conditions ( Conclusion: Tibial malrotation strongly influences PTS measurement on lateral radiographs. ETR leads to an underestimation, and ITR to an overestimation, of PTS. Every 1° of change in rotational alignment was equivalent to 0.2° of change in PTS measurement. For a reliable PTS measurement on lateral radiographs, the posterior tibial condyles should be superimposed exactly. Clinical Relevance: Dependent on PTS values, surgical correction of the PTS can be indicated. For a correct indication, it is of utmost importance to be able to determine the posterior slope exactly. This investigation demonstrates the effect of tibial rotation on PTS measurement and defines quality criteria, as well as a simple grading system for lateral radiographs for the measurement of the PTS. This helps surgeons to interpret radiographs correctly, allowing a better decision-making process, if and when a corrective osteotomy for PTS correction is indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.