ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
The Lever Sign Test Demonstrates Limited Clinical Utility for Diagnosing Full-Thickness Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears After a Traumatic Knee Injury.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05416632 (Diagnostic Accuracy of Hand Held Arthrometry and Clinical Tests for Diagnosing ACL Tears), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Hand Held Arthrometry and Clinical Tests for Diagnosing ACL Tears
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current systematic reviews with meta-analyses have identified the lever sign test as the best clinical examination for ruling out an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear, but the included studies have methodological limitations that could bias the test outcome, potentially overestimating its clinical utility. Purpose: To investigate the interrater reliability and concurrent validity of the lever sign test after a traumatic knee injury and to investigate the association between test variables (surface used, fist position, effusion grade, force applied, pain reported) and test outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The lever sign test was performed on hard and soft surfaces in 101 participants after a traumatic knee injury. Magnetic resonance imaging was used as the reference standard, with index testing performed after magnetic resonance imaging was conducted (>3 weeks after injury). Agreement between observers based on the surface used and fist position was evaluated with the Cohen kappa coefficient (κ). Concurrent validity was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. Logistic regression was used to determine whether effusion grade, force applied, and pain reported were significantly associated with test outcomes. Results: Interrater reliability was superior on the soft surface but demonstrated only moderate agreement (κ = 0.529 [95% CI, 0.368-0.691]). Sensitivity was higher on the soft surface, and specificity was higher on the hard surface, for both assessors. At best, positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.02 (95% CI, 1.60-5.69) and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.28-0.73), respectively. Test outcomes were affected by the surface used and fist position, but effusion grade, force applied, and pain reported were not significantly associated with correct/incorrect test results. Conclusion: In participants assessed from 3 weeks after a traumatic knee injury, the lever sign test demonstrated limited clinical utility for diagnosing full-thickness ACL tears. Test outcomes were affected by the surface used and fist position of the assessor. Registration: NCT05416632 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.