ArticleCureus2025
Rate of Retained Surgical Foreign Bodies in Texas Medicare Beneficiaries: Post-Pandemic Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify the difference between the rates of retained surgical foreign bodies (RSBs) in Texas Medicare beneficiaries before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, 2017-2019 and 2020-2022, respectively, by county and by the Human Health Service Commission (HHSC) region.
backgroundRetained surgical foreign bodies (RSBs) are items left in patients' bodies after surgical interventions (e.g., sponges, surgical instruments, etc.). Studies have shown an association between an increased risk of RSBs and unexpected intraoperative events, procedure duration, incorrect surgical counts, and variations in personnel on surgical teams. However, the existing literature has not focused on the impact of SARS-CoV-2 or the COVID-19 pandemic on RSB rates.
methodsData from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Datasets from 2020-2023 were used, along with Texas Hospital Data from the Texas Department of State and Health Services, to categorize the mean rates of RSBs before and after the COVID-19 pandemic by Texas HHSC regions and counties.
resultsNo significant differences were found between the pandemic-era and HHSC regions. However, the differences between Texas counties before and after the COVID-19 pandemic were statistically significant for both Colorado and Victoria. All other Texas counties showed no significant changes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
conclusionGiven the importance of reducing RSBs, follow-up studies that review specific surgical policies before and after the COVID-19 pandemic should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.