ArticleCureus2025
Examining Contemporary Human Dignity: How Human Rights Evolve and Reshape Health Justice.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Humanizing pulmonary care in the era of acoustic artificial intelligence: toward global health equity.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human rights did not emerge in a political or cultural vacuum; their origins in 20th-century legal frameworks and postcolonial power asymmetries continue to shape evolving notions of dignity and justice. Central to this evolution is the tension between civil and political rights, understood as immediately enforceable, and economic, social, and cultural rights, which are too often neglected or treated as merely aspirational. Securing health as a right requires both negative and positive state obligations, challenging simplistic divisions between public and private spheres and exposing how gendered, racialized, and class-based violence often remains hidden within private realms. Colonial legacies, neoliberal market forces, and structural inequalities further reinforce injustice by rendering marginalized groups undeserving of care. Grassroots movements, from AIDS activists to Indigenous women's campaigns, demonstrate the capacity of collective action to transform law, policy, and social norms. A rights-based approach to health financing demands that societies treat healthcare as a public good and moral commitment rather than as a commodity. At the global level, target-driven frameworks like the Millennium Development Goals have achieved discrete gains but often fail to address the systemic drivers of inequity. Ongoing armed conflicts reveal how militarized violence decimates health infrastructure and entrenches disparities for generations. True health equity and democracy, therefore, require robust institutions, transparent governance, and inclusive participation, all underpinned by the recognition that rights are shaped and reshaped by lived struggles. Only through this holistic lens, one that integrates civil, political, economic, social, and cultural dimensions, can efforts to realize the promise of universal human dignity be brought into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.