ReviewCureus2025
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections Following Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Recognition to Prevention: Modern Approaches to Complication Reduction in Colorectal Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy in pediatric spinal dysraphism: a single-center retrospective case series.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has emerged as a promising intervention for reducing surgical site infections (SSIs) across various surgical disciplines, particularly in high-risk abdominal and gastrointestinal surgeries. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of NPWT in preventing SSIs and improving postoperative outcomes in such procedures. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, identifying 641 studies, of which 10 high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. Studies included a range of abdominal procedures, including emergency laparotomies, colorectal cancer surgeries, and hepatopancreatobiliary interventions. Findings indicated that NPWT significantly reduced SSI rates in high-risk populations, particularly in contaminated and emergency abdominal surgeries, with reductions in seroma formation and wound dehiscence also observed. However, some studies reported no significant benefits in lower-risk procedures, highlighting the importance of appropriate patient selection. Quality assessment revealed moderate-to-high methodological quality, though common limitations included open-label designs and sample size variability. The results support the targeted use of NPWT in high-risk abdominal surgeries, though further large-scale, multicenter trials are needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.