ArticleCureus2025
Cauda Equina in Pregnancy: Early Management and Outcome.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but serious clinical presentation characterised by compression of the lumbosacral nerve roots below the conus medullaris, resulting in lower back pain, bilateral sciatica, motor and sensory deficits, and bladder or bowel dysfunction. Its occurrence in pregnancy is exceptionally rare and poses significant diagnostic and management challenges. We present the case of a 34-year-old woman at 22 weeks' gestation following in vitro fertilization (IVF) who developed acute bilateral leg pain, lower limb weakness, and urinary retention following a three-day history of backache. Neurological examination revealed reduced lower limb power, saddle anaesthesia, and loss of perianal sensation with absent ankle reflexes. MRI demonstrated a large L5/S1 disc extrusion completely filling the spinal canal. Following multidisciplinary assessment, she underwent urgent surgical decompression via left L5/S1 laminotomy within eight hours of symptom onset. A large sequestrated disc fragment was removed, and the nerve root canal decompressed. Post-operatively, the patient reported immediate relief of radicular pain and gradual return of bladder function and motor strength. Her pregnancy continued without complication, and she delivered a healthy baby by elective caesarean section at 38 weeks. At four-month follow-up, she had made a full recovery with complete resolution of neurological symptoms apart from mild residual back pain. This case highlights the importance of prompt recognition and early intervention in CES during pregnancy. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to facilitate timely imaging and surgery while ensuring maternal and fetal safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.