ReviewCureus2025
Opportunities, Challenges, and Lessons Learned From Partograph Utilization for Labor Monitoring in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of the Modified WHO Labour Care Guide to Detect Prolonged and Obstructed Labour Among Women Admitted at Eight Publicly Funded, Midwife-Led Community Health Facilities in Rural Mbarara District, Southwestern Uganda: An Ambispective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Trial
- Article
- Opportunities and challenges of integrating digital health into medical education curricula: A scoping review.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite decades of healthcare provider training and investment, rates of utilization and capacity to appropriately plot the partograph and use it to make critical decisions remain sub-optimal in Sub-Saharan Africa. The objective of this review was to synthesize evidence of existing challenges and opportunities of partograph utilization in labor monitoring in Sub-Saharan Africa from existing literature. PUBMED, Cochrane Library of Trials, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases published between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2023, for studies reporting opportunities and challenges of utilizing the partograph in labor monitoring in Sub-Saharan Africa, were searched. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guided the identification of eligible studies. We utilized a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to interpret findings. The review protocol was registered under PROSPERO-CRD42023452882. Twenty-eight high-quality studies identified from a total of 452 in eight countries in Sub-Saharan Africa were analyzed in this review. Opportunities identified included 1) the partograph's uncontested potential to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality facilitated by good support supervision, formal and on-the-job training, active mentorships, and ongoing supervision, and the availability of enabling policies, standards, and protocols on partograph use; 2) the availability of partographs in health facilities. Gaps and challenges identified included 1) lack of inadequate training and tool complexity, 2) availability of different labor monitoring tools other than the partograph, 3) lack of motivation and feedback, 4) unavailability of the partograph in some health facilities, 5) shortage of staff in busy facilities, 6) lack of support supervision, 7) lack of protocols, 8) inappropriate motivation leading to 9) lack of commitment, negative attitude, negligence, careless partograph completion, or non-use. The challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned from this review on partograph utilization in labor monitoring will help develop suitable implementation strategies to guide the introduction and scale-up of the labor care guide in Sub-Saharan Africa if we are to avoid similar challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.