Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376327›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Robot-Assisted Surgery: Current Applications and Future Trends in General Surgery.

Juan Carlos Rojas Burbano, Nicolás Idárraga Ruiz, Gustavo Andrés Rojas Burbano, José Sebastián Guacho Inca, Carlos Alejandro Arragan Lezama, Manuel Sánchez González

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. NIRS monitoring during steep trendelenburg in robotic prostatectomy.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Palpation sensing for robotic-assisted surgery.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Real Robotic Surgery: A New Paradigm of Surgical Approach.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juan Carlos Rojas BurbanoGeneral Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, ECU.
Nicolás Idárraga RuizSurgery, Clínica Medicádiz, Ibagué, COL.
Gustavo Andrés Rojas BurbanoSurgery, Hospital de Especialidades Eugenio Espejo, Quito, ECU.
José Sebastián Guacho IncaSurgery, Hospital de Especialidades Eugenio Espejo, Quito, ECU.
Carlos Alejandro Arragan LezamaGeneral Practice, Universidad Anáhuac Xalapa, Veracruz, MEX.
Manuel Sánchez GonzálezSurgery, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, IMSS, Guadalajara, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in digital equipment have been applied to treating complex medical cases. However, the literature has not comprehensively reported these applications, and the outcomes of conventional surgeries have not been compared with robot-assisted surgeries to determine efficacy. Therefore, this literature review aimed to find and compare outcomes. According to existing literature, robot-assisted surgery has brought significant changes to various aspects of general surgical practice. The research outcomes have shown that robotic surgery minimizes surgical invasiveness by enabling smaller incisions, reducing blood loss, and accelerating patient recovery. The da Vinci Surgical System has shown enhanced surgical accuracy due to better control when operating in complex cases such as colorectal resections, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and hernia repairs. The use of robotic systems enables surgeons to remain comfortable while performing complex procedures because the system allows them to maintain ergonomic body positions. Robotic systems lead to better clinical outcomes for patients, such as rapid hospital discharge, fewer complications, and faster recovery times. The advantages of robotic surgery will become more apparent once technical challenges regarding costs, learning curves, and haptic feedback are fully addressed.

Indexed as

applications and trendsgeneral surgeryliterature reviewrobot-assisted surgeryrobot-assisted surgery (ras)

Identifiers

PMID40376327
PMCPMC12080974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.