ReviewCureus2025
Cardiovascular Outcomes of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review of the Current Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Risk in Psoriatic Arthritis: Mechanisms, Risk Assessment, and Long-Term Management Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Optimising Conventional Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026Review
- Venous thromboembolism events associated with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a real-world study from FAERS database.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Review
- Arrhythmias in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Call for a Multidisciplinary Team.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Effects of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs on Cardiovascular Risk in Inflammatory Joint Diseases: Current Evidence and Uncertainties.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and heart failure (HF), with RA treatments influencing cardiovascular outcomes. This review analyses the cardiovascular effects of methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, and TNF inhibitors (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and certolizumab) in RA management, emphasizing their safety and risks in CVD. This narrative literature review was conducted using searches of the PubMed database from inception through January 2025. We included meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, pharmacovigilance studies, and animal studies. Methotrexate offers cardiovascular benefits by reducing inflammation and improving endothelial function. However, it also raises homocysteine levels, which promote oxidative stress and endothelial injury - effects that can be mitigated by folic acid supplementation. Leflunomide's cardiovascular effects remain poorly defined, highlighting the need for further research. Hydroxychloroquine may prolong the QT interval, raising the risk of conduction disorders and necessitating monitoring in high-risk patients. Sulfasalazine shows potential cardiovascular benefits by inhibition of platelet aggregation, improved endothelial function, and reduced lipid levels, although more research is needed for conclusive evidence. TNF inhibitors, such as infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and certolizumab pegol, reduce inflammation-driven cardiovascular risks but are contraindicated in patients with severe HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] classes III and IV).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.