Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376285›Full record

ArticlePostepy psychiatrii neurologii2025

Recent insights into depression from transcriptomic analysis.

Melih Günay, Meliha M Çiçekliyurt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melih GünayGraduate School of Science, Department of Medical Biology, Bioinformatics and System Biology, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0336-3010
Meliha M ÇiçekliyurtDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4303-9717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Depression is a widespread mood disorder with a high rate of relapse and chronicity that can be affected by gender, and caused by traumatic or stressful events. Transcriptome analysis measures gene expression heterogeneity in cells, tissues, organs, and the whole body. The purpose of the study was to investigate both gender-specific and tissue-specific variations in gene expression regarding depression based on transcriptomic analysis using RNA-Seq data. Methods: The depression datasets GSE190518 and GSE214921 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database provided by the NCBI. The GSE190518 datasets include peripheral blood samples (4 patients, 4 healthy controls), and the GSE214921 datasets contain human postmortem orbitofrontal cortex bulk tissue (20 patients, 19 healthy controls). All datasets were analyzed separately with the DESeq2 package in R. Later, GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of differentially expressed genes were performed using the clusterProfiler package in R. Results: Our results reveal that depression stimulates genes linked to the immune system, which is a common denominator in both brain tissue and blood samples. Overall, tissue-specific factors contribute to the association between depression and the immune system via distinct genes. Furthermore, gene ontology analyses revealed that Conclusions: Comparative transcriptomic evidence supports the immune hypothesis of depression in different tissue samples. Gender-specific depression may be triggered by protein misfolding.

Indexed as

comparative transcriptomeGEO databaseheat shock proteinmajor depressive disorderRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID40376285
PMCPMC12076128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.