ArticleChina CDC weekly2025
A Novel Adaptive Design Approach for Early-Phase Clinical Trials to Optimize Vaccine Dosage.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Cancer Vaccines for Digestive System Cancers: A Systematic Analysis of Clinical Trials.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Vaccines are a cornerstone of global health, with their efficacy and safety dependent on appropriate dosage determination. Early-phase vaccination trials face significant challenges due to minimal toxicity and nonmonotonic dose response curves, creating a major obstacle in vaccine development. To address this gap, we propose a novel Bayesian phase I/II trial design for dose response curves exhibiting plateau or unimodal patterns to identify the optimal biological dose (OBD), effectively balancing efficacy and toxicity. Methods: We employ a logistic dose-efficacy design that makes dose-escalation and de-escalation decisions while simultaneously considering both efficacy and safety parameters. Extensive simulation studies evaluate the performance of this design. Results: Comparative analyses with commonly used vaccine dose-finding designs demonstrate that our method excels in identifying the optimal toxicity-efficacy trade-off, offering both simplicity and accuracy. Sensitivity analyses across various prior settings confirm the robustness and efficiency of our approach. Additionally, our design provides a user-friendly framework for clinicians, with superior operating performance compared to existing designs, particularly in terms of accuracy and robustness. Discussion: Our innovative Bayesian design represents a significant advancement in addressing the inherent challenges of early-phase vaccination clinical trials, offering improved accuracy and efficacy in vaccine dosage determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.