ArticleChina CDC weekly2025
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sequential Screening Strategies for Hepatitis B Virus Infection by Birth Cohort - China.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Eliminating hepatitis B virus (HBV) as a major public health threat is a global health priority that requires cost-effective screening strategies. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sequential birth cohort HBV screening strategies in China. Methods: Using a Markov model, we compared five screening strategies with current practice, calculating HBV-related deaths averted, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results: The sequential birth cohort screening strategy (Sequential Screening 1: screening the 1991-2000 cohort in 2025-2026, the 1971-1990 cohort in 2027-2028, and the 1951-1970 cohort in 2029-2030) was the most cost-effective, with an ICER of 58,523 Chinese Yuan (CNY) per QALY at a willingness-to-pay threshold of three times the per-capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). An alternative strategy that prioritized the 1951-1970 cohort in 2025-2026 averted the most HBV-related deaths (approximately 3.44 million) and gained 24.9 million QALYs, with an ICER of 60,113 CNY per QALY, also showing cost-effectiveness. Discussion: Our findings support sequential birth cohort screening as an optimal and innovative approach to achieving the WHO HBV elimination targets, offering evidence-informed guidance for policymakers to optimize screening programs and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.