Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376247›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2025

Associations Between Family Medicine Residency Applicants' Debt Concern and Their Perception of Virtual Residency Interviews.

Srilakshmi P Vankina, Radhika Laddha, Alison N Huffstetler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srilakshmi P VankinaUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
Radhika LaddhaRobert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC.
Alison N HuffstetlerRobert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Since the shift to virtual residency interviews following the COVID-19 pandemic and the initial 2021 and 2022 endorsement from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, applicants and programs have been weighing the benefits and disadvantages of this transition. This study examines the impact of debt concern among family medicine residency applicants and their likelihood of (1) accepting virtual interview offers and (2) recommending the digital format for future application cycles. Methods: Using responses from the American Academy of Family Physicians 2023 Medical Student Education Survey, we applied descriptive bivariate analysis and rapid cycle thematic evaluation to explore associations between 2023 family medicine residency applicants' debt concern and their perception of digital residency interviews. Results: A majority of our study sample (86%) had some level of debt concern. A majority (88.8%) also noted that most of their interviews were virtual. Regardless of debt concern, most students (87.4%) indicated that they accepted offers for virtual interviews that they otherwise may not have accepted if travel time and expenses were involved. Furthermore, most students (87.1%) recommended a virtual component to future residency interviews. Conclusion: Contrary to our expectations, there was no association between concern for debt and preference for virtual interviews. Most candidates preferred the virtual setting, stating that they were more likely to accept virtual interview offers, and recommended this format for future cycles.

Identifiers

PMID40376247
PMCPMC12081022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.