Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376238›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2025

Influence of Reproductive Health Policy on West Texas Medical Students' Specialty and Residency Choices.

Sachi Khemka, Merry Mathew, Betsy Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sachi Khemka *Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX.
Merry Mathew *Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX.
Betsy JonesDepartment of Medical Education, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gender-based differences in medical student preferences are of growing interest. This study examines specialty choice and family planning preferences among medical students in Lubbock, Texas. It also assesses the impact of reproductive health policy changes on specialty choice and desired residency location. Methods: A Qualtrics (Silver Lake) survey was sent to 172 first-year medical students from Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) School of Medicine. Males' responses were compared with females' responses using an unpaired Results: Surveys were returned by 90 male and 82 female participants. Results show that both genders exhibited moderate interest in primary care and surgical specialties, with males showing higher interest in becoming medical subspecialists ( Conclusions: The findings indicate that male students are more open to the idea of having a child during training and that reproductive health policy changes have had a larger influence on female students' specialty choice and desired match location. To support physicians-in-training, educators should integrate family planning discussions, prioritize reproductive health education, advocate for and improve residency transparency on parental leave policies, and help students navigate residency applications amid policy changes.

Identifiers

PMID40376238
PMCPMC12081016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.