Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376220›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2025

Pelvic Trauma: Anatomy and Interventions.

Jacob F Leslie, John B Smirniotopoulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob F LeslieDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
John B SmirniotopoulosDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trauma, particularly pelvic trauma, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with hemorrhage being the primary cause of death in these trauma patients. In particular, pelvic fractures often result in substantial vascular injuries, requiring rapid diagnosis, and intervention to prevent fatal outcomes. Multiphase computed tomography angiography (CTA) has emerged as the gold standard for assessing pelvic trauma, facilitating early identification of vascular injuries and active hemorrhage. Interventional radiology (IR) plays a key role in managing these injuries through angiography and embolization, effectively stabilizing hemodynamics and preventing long-term complications such as necrosis or claudication. The complex vascular anatomy of the pelvis, including variants like the corona mortis and aberrant obturator arteries, necessitates careful planning during angiography. Techniques such as nonselective embolization, selective embolization with temporary embolic, and coil embolization are critical in achieving hemostasis. While effective, these procedures carry risks, including rebleeding and complications such as neuropathy and gluteal necrosis. Early activation of the angiography suite and multiphase CTA are essential to improving patient outcomes. This review outlines the anatomy, evaluation, and management strategies for pelvic trauma, emphasizing the importance of rapid intervention and the integral role of IR in controlling hemorrhage and ensuring patient survival.

Indexed as

angiographyarterial anatomyembolizationinterventional radiologypelvic trauma

Identifiers

PMID40376220
PMCPMC12077944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.