ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Analysis of the use, effectiveness, and efficiency of the pick and roll in elite women's basketball.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness and outcomes of "pick and roll" plays in elite women's basketball, focusing on the 2021-2022 EuroLeague Final Four. The main objective is to analyze the tactical efficiency of these actions and identify the most effective resolution strategies. A total of 298 plays from 1,757 events across four matches were examined using an observational methodology, adhering to a Nomothetic, Point, and Multidimensional (N/P/M) design. An observational instrument consisted on twenty-three criteria and 126 categories was developed to codify the actions, with reliability confirmed by a Cohen's Kappa value of 0.93, indicating "almost perfect" agreement. Results show that 71.8% of "pick and roll" plays concluded with a shot, with the highest success rates achieved when the screener executed the final attempt near the basket. Actions with fewer passes post-screen were significantly more effective, and collective strategies, such as passing to the screener, outperformed individual efforts by the ball handler. In addition, the multivariate results highlight the second and third quarters of the game as the most important when it comes to executing an effective offensive pick & roll. These findings emphasize the importance of immediate actions post-screen, tactical fluidity, and proximity to the basket, providing valuable insights to enhance offensive strategies in competitive women's basketball.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.